Estrategia añadida por DragonsAfterDark
6
6
Puntuación media: |
5 |
Puntuaciones: |
10 |
Tu voto: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Etiquetas
Filtrar estrategias:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 |
Cualquier Humanoide de nivel 25+
|
Script thanks to wist
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.2 | 33 | 92
1:32
|
15 | ||
2 | Tienda Script |
2 | 5.0 | 6 | 120
2:00
|
20+ | ||||
3 |
Script provided by Hamadryad
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.5 | 6 | 103
1:43
|
15 | |||
4 |
The idea was to reduce RNG, where possible. It's still not quite guaranteed, but anything better than Demolish-dependant strategy, right?
Bottlenecks are still Blood in the Water, which can crit and 1-shot the Runt. Also Sandstorm adds moderate RNG to both sides with 10% miss. Keep in mind that Megaladon for some reason is not affected by Sandstorm at all. It still does 390 dmg to all pets no matter what. If you fail because of too many misses, try applying Sandstorm only once. |
RNG Script |
2 | 4.2 | 4 | 150
2:30
|
23+ | |||
5 |
Cualquier Humanoide de nivel 25+
|
Script thanks to isthevao
|
RNG Script |
2 | 4.8 | 3 | 105
1:45
|
16+ | ||
6 |
A little RNG here; whether this works depends a lot on how often Demolish hits. That being said, there's a lot of wiggle room and you can still win even if it misses several times.
If Bruce is at around half health by the time Crusher dies and your backline hasn't been totally spammed by the sharks' AoE abilities, you are almost guaranteed to win. |
RNG |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 107
1:47
|
18 | |||
7 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 125
2:05
|
15 |
Incl. pasos:
Habilidades: * * 1
Raza: Cualquier
Raza | Salud | Poder | Velocidad |
---|---|---|---|
PP | 1359 | 333 | 260 |
Sustitutos:
1 / 2
Antes | Después | Ganancia de Experiencia | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | ➜ | 3 | 239 |
2 | ➜ | 4 | 254 |
3 | ➜ | 4 | 267 |
4 | ➜ | 5 | 279 |
5 | ➜ | 6 | 289 |
6 | ➜ | 6 | 297 |
7 | ➜ | 7 | 304 |
8 | ➜ | 8 | 309 |
9 | ➜ | 9 | 312 |
10 | ➜ | 10 | 314 |
11 | ➜ | 11 | 314 |
12 | ➜ | 12 | 312 |
13 | ➜ | 13 | 309 |
14 | ➜ | 14 | 304 |
15 | ➜ | 15 | 297 |
16 | ➜ | 16 | 289 |
17 | ➜ | 17 | 279 |
18 | ➜ | 18 | 267 |
19 | ➜ | 19 | 254 |
20 | ➜ | 20 | 239 |
21 | ➜ | 21 | 223 |
22 | ➜ | 22 | 205 |
23 | ➜ | 23 | 185 |
24 | ➜ | 24 | 163 |
Sombrero de safari |
|
Chuchería inferior para mascotas |
|
Chuchería para mascotas |
|
Chistera de la Luna Negra |
|
Semana de Duelos de Mascotas |
= |
La mascota sube a nivel 25 con pérdida mínima de EXP |
|
= |
Se pierde la EXP adicional por encima del nivel 25 |
|
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Wet paws are always bad.
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosBomigab
escrito el 2024-01-31 09:34:28
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosDoc25
escrito el 2020-03-15 09:58:50
0
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosYav escrito el 2019-07-13 12:19:53
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosKrol#2575
escrito el 2019-06-30 19:27:54
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosTelepatra
escrito el 2019-06-22 21:26:23
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosLerna
escrito el 2019-04-22 22:41:27
3
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosPrudentius
escrito el 2019-03-02 22:24:56
if [ enemy.aura(Frost Shock:415).exists ]
ability(Deep Freeze:481) [ self.ability(Flash Freeze:1955).duration < 2 ]
ability(Deep Freeze:481) [ enemy(#3).active ]
endif
ability(Flash Freeze:1955) [ ! enemy(#1).dead ]
ability(Flash Freeze:1955) [ enemy(#3).active ]
ability(Greench's Gift:1076)
ability(#1)
standby
change(next)
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentariosAenigma#1513
escrito el 2019-01-23 14:08:51
1
Debes iniciar sesión para votar en los comentarios(OP) DragonsAfterDark
escrito el 2019-01-23 14:31:45
Glad it worked for you :)
Nuevo comentario: